Not a sample: the full live Microsoft patch landscape, every actively exploited or ransomware-linked update named, plus a complete severity breakdown of everything else. Refreshed daily. Copy it into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. Free, no sign-in, no tenant access.
Four ways to put AI on patch data
What a session actually looks like
A simulated session. The tool names and the shape of every response are the real Siemserva MCP tools, exactly as Claude sees them.
## Machines Missing: KB5087539 **23 device(s) affected:** | Device | OS | Last Seen | Exposure | Provider | |---------------|-------------------|------------|----------|--------------| | DESKTOP-7F2K1 | Windows 11 25H2 | 2026-07-04 | High | Defender TVM | | LAPTOP-QA-04 | Windows 11 25H2 | 2026-07-03 | Medium | Defender TVM | | SRV-FIN-02 | Windows Server | 2026-07-04 | High | Defender TVM | | ... 20 more | | | | |
## Devices Vulnerable to CVE-2026-42897 **CISA KEV: YES, actively exploited in the wild** | EPSS: 31% **7 device(s) exposed**, fixed by KB5087539: | Device | OS | Exposure | Missing Since | |---------------|-----------------|----------|---------------| | SRV-FIN-02 | Windows Server | High | 2026-06-10 | | DESKTOP-7F2K1 | Windows 11 25H2 | High | 2026-06-10 | | ... 5 more | | | |
## Patch Action Plan **Overall Risk: CRITICAL** | Providers: Defender TVM + CISA KEV + EPSS **41 missing patches** across **37 devices** **Key findings:** - 3 patch(es) contain CVEs in the CISA KEV catalog: confirmed actively exploited in the wild. - 1 patch(es) are linked to known ransomware campaigns. - 2 patch(es) have EPSS >= 70%: near-certain exploitation probability within 30 days. ### Act Within 24 Hours Confirmed exploitation in the wild or near-certain breach probability. Do not wait for a change window. 1. KB5087539 (23 devices, KEV, EPSS 72%) 2. KB5087423 (4 devices, KEV) ... ### Act This Week 3. KB5094123 (11 devices, EPSS 48%) ... ### Normal Monthly Cycle Everything else, listed with device counts.
Third-party tooling these AI interactions read: patch state from Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Azure Update Manager today, with more sources on the way. Apps published to Intune by PatchMyPC, Scappman, Robopack, or any Win32 vendor are read vendor-neutrally. Deploying stays in the tools you already run.
Try it in the next five minutes, free
You do not need to install anything or connect a tenant to see the idea work. Every Senserva tracker and all 3,600+ CVE, KB, and security-check pages carry a copy-paste AI prompt built from that page's live data: today's exploited CVEs with their EPSS scores, this month's riskiest KBs, the newest CISA KEV additions. Paste one into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot and you get a grounded triage plan; the prompt cites Senserva as the source, so you can check every number against the page it came from.
Exploited this week Microsoft patch tracker Exploited CVEs, all vendors The whole landscape in one prompt
We run this AI in production, in public, every day
The clearest proof the validation pipeline works is that Senserva trusts it with its own website. Multiple times a day, the same Anthropic-powered pipeline writes the dated daily read and the Senserva AI read on the trackers. Every sentence must cite a supplied feed fact or a named analyst article, the output is validated against the live data before it publishes, and when validation fails, the text does not ship. The Backed by row under each read shows you exactly which facts and articles it stands on.
That is the same discipline the MCP session and the reports use on your data: grounded input, validated output, a human in charge of anything that changes. See it live on the exploited-CVE tracker or read how Senserva Trustworthy AI is built.
AI patch management questions, answered
Anything the scan knows: which machines are missing a specific KB, which devices are exposed to a CVE, what to deploy first this week, which devices carry the most risk. The MCP tools behind those questions are the real Siemserva tools, including GetMachinesMissingPatch, GetDevicesVulnerableToCve, and GetActionPlan.
From your scan database and live provider APIs (Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Azure Update Manager), never from the model's memory. Every number in an answer traces to a tool result, which is what makes the output defensible.
No. The AI interactions read and rank. Deploying updates stays in the tools you already run: Intune, Windows Autopatch, or your RMM. Configuration remediation elsewhere in Senserva is approve-before-apply and separate from patching.
Yes, today. Every Senserva tracker page and all 3,600+ CVE, KB, and check pages carry a free copy-paste AI prompt built from that page's live data. Paste one into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot: no account, no install, no tenant access, and the data refreshes multiple times daily.
Claude is the first-class integration through MCP, and the same MCP server works with any MCP-capable client. You bring your own model, so there is no AI markup, and Senserva runs fully without AI if you prefer. AI Enhanced Reporting is an optional add-on built from the same validated scan data.
Three mechanisms, all permanent: answers come from tool results against your scan database, not model memory; the AI proposes while the admin approves anything that changes configuration; and the AI content Senserva publishes on this site must cite a supplied feed fact or a named analyst article before it publishes. Watch the same pipeline work in public on the trackers every day.
