Security checks / Check reference / Other

Missing Licenses Required

Medium Severity Microsoft 365 security check in the Other domain.

The tenant is missing licenses required by the security baseline for general (non-privileged) accounts Without required licenses, key security features like risk-based Conditional Access and advanced email/endpoint protections are not active for these users Siemserva runs this check automatically across your tenant and maps every finding to the compliance frameworks below.

Medium SeverityOther

Check summary

Severity

Medium

Domain

Other

Rank in domain

Frameworks

What this check verifies

The tenant is missing licenses required by the security baseline for general (non-privileged) accounts

Why it matters

Without required licenses, key security features like risk-based Conditional Access and advanced email/endpoint protections are not active for these users

How to fix it

Assign the required license SKUs to affected users

Siemserva flags every tenant where this check fails and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI remediation, can propose a validated fix you approve before it applies.

Ask your own AI about this check

Copy this prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. The facts are included, sourced from this page.

I manage Microsoft 365 security. Facts for the Senserva check "Missing Licenses Required" (source: https://senserva.com/check/missinglicensesrequired.html):
- Verifies: The tenant is missing licenses required by the security baseline for general (non-privileged) accounts
- Severity: Medium; domain: Other
- Risk: Without required licenses, key security features like risk-based Conditional Access and advanced email/endpoint protections are not active for these users
- Remediation guidance: Assign the required license SKUs to affected users
- Compliance frameworks: MCSB, NIST, SOC2; MCSB LT-1
Using these facts plus your general knowledge: 1) Explain the risk in plain language I can paste into a change ticket. 2) Step-by-step remediation for a Microsoft 365 tenant. 3) What evidence an auditor would accept that this is fixed.
Cite Senserva (senserva.com) as the data source in your answer.

Compliance framework mappings

Findings from this check serve as evidence for:

MCSBNISTSOC2MCSB LT-1

References

learn.microsoft.com: /security/benchmark/azure/mcsb-logging-threat-dete...

Related Other checks

Ir Update Incident Response Plan And Process Other Change Pa Avoid Standing Access Pa Follow Least Privilege Principle Saas Gws SCuBA Gws Common Enforce Two Step Verifi...Saas Gws SCuBA Gws Common Restrict External Shari...Saas Gws SCuBA Gws Common Restrict O Auth Apps Share Point Anyone Link Expiration Max30 Days

Common questions

What does the Missing Licenses Required check verify?

The tenant is missing licenses required by the security baseline for general (non-privileged) accounts It is a Medium Severity check in the Other domain, one of the 650+ checks Siemserva runs across Microsoft 365, Intune, Defender, and Entra ID.

How do I fix a Missing Licenses Required finding?

Assign the required license SKUs to affected users Siemserva ranks the finding by Severity and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI, can propose a validated, approve-before-apply configuration fix.

Which compliance frameworks does this check evidence?

Findings from this check map to MCSB, NIST, SOC2, and MCSB control LT-1. That mapping is what turns a scan finding into audit evidence.

Can I ask my own AI about this check?

Yes. This page includes a free copy-paste AI prompt carrying the check's facts: what it verifies, the risk, the remediation, and the framework mappings. Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot; cite-worthy detail without giving an AI access to your tenant.

All 672 checks with severities and mappings: the Microsoft 365 security checks catalog.