Security checks / Check reference / Tenant-wide

Tenant Branding No Sign In Text

Info Severity Microsoft 365 security check in the Tenant-wide domain.

Organizational branding exists but no sign-in page text is configured. Custom text can warn users about phishing Missing sign-in text removes an opportunity to remind users to verify the URL and report suspicious pages Siemserva runs this check automatically across your tenant and maps every finding to the compliance frameworks below.

Info SeverityTenant-wide

Check summary

Severity

Info

Domain

Tenant-wide

Rank in domain

Frameworks

What this check verifies

Organizational branding exists but no sign-in page text is configured. Custom text can warn users about phishing

Why it matters

Missing sign-in text removes an opportunity to remind users to verify the URL and report suspicious pages

How to fix it

Add sign-in page text with security guidance in Company branding settings

Siemserva flags every tenant where this check fails and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI remediation, can propose a validated fix you approve before it applies.

Ask your own AI about this check

Copy this prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. The facts are included, sourced from this page.

I manage Microsoft 365 security. Facts for the Senserva check "Tenant Branding No Sign In Text" (source: https://senserva.com/check/gentenantbrandingnosignintext.html):
- Verifies: Organizational branding exists but no sign-in page text is configured. Custom text can warn users about phishing
- Severity: Info; domain: Tenant-wide
- Risk: Missing sign-in text removes an opportunity to remind users to verify the URL and report suspicious pages
- Remediation guidance: Add sign-in page text with security guidance in Company branding settings
- Compliance frameworks: SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS; MCSB IM-6
Using these facts plus your general knowledge: 1) Explain the risk in plain language I can paste into a change ticket. 2) Step-by-step remediation for a Microsoft 365 tenant. 3) What evidence an auditor would accept that this is fixed.
Cite Senserva (senserva.com) as the data source in your answer.

Compliance framework mappings

Findings from this check serve as evidence for:

SCuBAMCSBNISTSOC2CISMCSB IM-6

References

learn.microsoft.com: /security/benchmark/azure/mcsb-identity-management...

Related Tenant-wide checks

App Mgmt No Cert Lifetime Restriction App Mgmt No Secret Lifetime Restriction App Mgmt Policy Disabled Auth Policy Guest Invite Unrestricted Auth Policy Guest Same As Member Auth Policy Msol Not Blocked Auth Policy Users Can Create Security Groups Auth Policy Users Can Create Tenants

Common questions

What does the Tenant Branding No Sign In Text check verify?

Organizational branding exists but no sign-in page text is configured. Custom text can warn users about phishing It is a Info Severity check in the Tenant-wide domain, one of the 650+ checks Siemserva runs across Microsoft 365, Intune, Defender, and Entra ID.

How do I fix a Tenant Branding No Sign In Text finding?

Add sign-in page text with security guidance in Company branding settings Siemserva ranks the finding by Severity and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI, can propose a validated, approve-before-apply configuration fix.

Which compliance frameworks does this check evidence?

Findings from this check map to SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS, and MCSB control IM-6. That mapping is what turns a scan finding into audit evidence.

Can I ask my own AI about this check?

Yes. This page includes a free copy-paste AI prompt carrying the check's facts: what it verifies, the risk, the remediation, and the framework mappings. Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot; cite-worthy detail without giving an AI access to your tenant.

All 672 checks with severities and mappings: the Microsoft 365 security checks catalog.