Security checks / Check reference / Identity management

Low Risk Detection Data

High Severity Microsoft 365 security check in the Identity management domain.

Low-risk detection data record from Entra ID Protection Low-risk signals ignored allow stealth persistence and stepwise escalation toward higher-value targets Siemserva runs this check automatically across your tenant and maps every finding to the compliance frameworks below.

High SeverityIdentity managementSCuBA MS.AAD.6.1v1

Check summary

Severity

High

Domain

Identity management

Rank in domain

Frameworks

What this check verifies

Low-risk detection data record from Entra ID Protection

Why it matters

Low-risk signals ignored allow stealth persistence and stepwise escalation toward higher-value targets

How to fix it

Monitor trends; ensure CA risk-based policies auto-remediate; investigate if count is climbing

Siemserva flags every tenant where this check fails and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI remediation, can propose a validated fix you approve before it applies.

Ask your own AI about this check

Copy this prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. The facts are included, sourced from this page.

I manage Microsoft 365 security. Facts for the Senserva check "Low Risk Detection Data" (source: https://senserva.com/check/imlowriskdetectiondata.html):
- Verifies: Low-risk detection data record from Entra ID Protection
- Severity: High; domain: Identity management
- Risk: Low-risk signals ignored allow stealth persistence and stepwise escalation toward higher-value targets
- Remediation guidance: Monitor trends; ensure CA risk-based policies auto-remediate; investigate if count is climbing
- Compliance frameworks: SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS, HIPAA; SCuBA MS.AAD.6.1v1; MCSB LT-3, IM-6
Using these facts plus your general knowledge: 1) Explain the risk in plain language I can paste into a change ticket. 2) Step-by-step remediation for a Microsoft 365 tenant. 3) What evidence an auditor would accept that this is fixed.
Cite Senserva (senserva.com) as the data source in your answer.

Compliance framework mappings

Findings from this check serve as evidence for:

SCuBAMCSBNISTSOC2CISHIPAASCuBA MS.AAD.6.1v1MCSB LT-3MCSB IM-6

References

learn.microsoft.com: /security/benchmark/azure/mcsb-identity-management...www.cisa.gov: /sites/default/files/2023-12/Azure%20Active%20Dire...

Related Identity management checks

At Risk Signin At Risk With High Risk At Risk With Low Risk At Risk With Medium Risk Group Empty Group Guest Member Group Member Of Directory Role Group Public M365 Group

Related Entra ID guides

This is an Entra ID and identity check. See the broader guidance and the exact checks Siemserva runs in this area:

Entra ID security best practices Azure AD and Entra ID security All Identity management checks

Common questions

What does the Low Risk Detection Data check verify?

Low-risk detection data record from Entra ID Protection It is a High Severity check in the Identity management domain, one of the 650+ checks Siemserva runs across Microsoft 365, Intune, Defender, and Entra ID.

How do I fix a Low Risk Detection Data finding?

Monitor trends; ensure CA risk-based policies auto-remediate; investigate if count is climbing Siemserva ranks the finding by Severity and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI, can propose a validated, approve-before-apply configuration fix.

Which compliance frameworks does this check evidence?

Findings from this check map to SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS, HIPAA, including SCuBA policy MS.AAD.6.1v1, and MCSB controls LT-3, IM-6. That mapping is what turns a scan finding into audit evidence.

Can I ask my own AI about this check?

Yes. This page includes a free copy-paste AI prompt carrying the check's facts: what it verifies, the risk, the remediation, and the framework mappings. Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot; cite-worthy detail without giving an AI access to your tenant.

All 672 checks with severities and mappings: the Microsoft 365 security checks catalog.