Conditional Access High Coverage Gap

Check summary

What this check verifies

Tenant-wide coverage matrix found a high-severity coverage gap

Why it matters

A high-severity coverage gap in your Conditional Access matrix. A common attack path is not protected by any policy

How to fix it

Close the coverage gap by creating or expanding CA policies for the missing scenario

Siemserva flags every tenant where this check fails and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI remediation, can propose a validated fix you approve before it applies.

Ask your own AI about this check

Copy this prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. The facts are included, sourced from this page.

Compliance framework mappings

Findings from this check serve as evidence for:

References

Related Conditional Access checks

Common questions

What does the Conditional Access High Coverage Gap check verify?

Tenant-wide coverage matrix found a high-severity coverage gap It is a Medium Severity check in the Conditional Access domain, one of the 650+ checks Siemserva runs across Microsoft 365, Intune, Defender, and Entra ID.

How do I fix a Conditional Access High Coverage Gap finding?

Close the coverage gap by creating or expanding CA policies for the missing scenario Siemserva ranks the finding by Severity and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI, can propose a validated, approve-before-apply configuration fix.

Which compliance frameworks does this check evidence?

Findings from this check map to SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS, HIPAA, including SCuBA policy MS.AAD.1.1v1, MS.AAD.2.1v1, MS.AAD.2.2v1, MS.AAD.2.3v1, MS.AAD.3.1v1, MS.AAD.3.2v1, and MCSB control IM-6. That mapping is what turns a scan finding into audit evidence.

Can I ask my own AI about this check?

Yes. This page includes a free copy-paste AI prompt carrying the check's facts: what it verifies, the risk, the remediation, and the framework mappings. Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot; cite-worthy detail without giving an AI access to your tenant.