Security checks / Check reference / Conditional Access

Conditional Access Enforces Risk Levels Both Signin And User Risk In Same Policy

Medium Severity Microsoft 365 security check in the Conditional Access domain.

A single CA policy includes both sign-in risk and user risk. Microsoft recommends separating these A single policy handling both risk types is harder to tune and troubleshoot One misconfiguration affects both sign-in risk and user risk responses Siemserva runs this check automatically across your tenant and maps every finding to the compliance frameworks below.

Medium SeverityConditional AccessSCuBA MS.AAD.1.1v1

Check summary

Severity

Medium

Domain

Conditional Access

Rank in domain

Frameworks

What this check verifies

A single CA policy includes both sign-in risk and user risk. Microsoft recommends separating these

Why it matters

A single policy handling both risk types is harder to tune and troubleshoot One misconfiguration affects both sign-in risk and user risk responses

How to fix it

Split into two policies: one for sign-in risk (require MFA) and one for user risk (require password change)

Siemserva flags every tenant where this check fails and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI remediation, can propose a validated fix you approve before it applies.

Ask your own AI about this check

Copy this prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. The facts are included, sourced from this page.

I manage Microsoft 365 security. Facts for the Senserva check "Conditional Access Enforces Risk Levels Both Signin And User Risk In Same Policy" (source: https://senserva.com/check/imconditionalaccessenforcesrisklevelsbothsigninanduserriskinsamepolicy.html):
- Verifies: A single CA policy includes both sign-in risk and user risk. Microsoft recommends separating these
- Severity: Medium; domain: Conditional Access
- Risk: A single policy handling both risk types is harder to tune and troubleshoot One misconfiguration affects both sign-in risk and user risk responses
- Remediation guidance: Split into two policies: one for sign-in risk (require MFA) and one for user risk (require password change)
- Compliance frameworks: SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS, HIPAA; SCuBA MS.AAD.1.1v1, MS.AAD.2.1v1, MS.AAD.2.2v1, MS.AAD.2.3v1, MS.AAD.3.1v1, MS.AAD.3.2v1; MCSB IM-6, LT-3
Using these facts plus your general knowledge: 1) Explain the risk in plain language I can paste into a change ticket. 2) Step-by-step remediation for a Microsoft 365 tenant. 3) What evidence an auditor would accept that this is fixed.
Cite Senserva (senserva.com) as the data source in your answer.

Compliance framework mappings

Findings from this check serve as evidence for:

SCuBAMCSBNISTSOC2CISHIPAASCuBA MS.AAD.1.1v1 SCuBA MS.AAD.2.1v1 SCuBA MS.AAD.2.2v1 SCuBA MS.AAD.2.3v1 SCuBA MS.AAD.3.1v1 SCuBA MS.AAD.3.2v1MCSB IM-6MCSB LT-3

References

learn.microsoft.com: /entra/identity/conditional-access/overview...learn.microsoft.com: /entra/identity/conditional-access/plan-conditiona...www.cisa.gov: /sites/default/files/2023-12/Azure%20Active%20Dire...

Related Conditional Access checks

Conditional Access Admin Portal Missing MFA Conditional Access Block Legacy Exchange Active S...Conditional Access Block Legacy Exchange Active S...Conditional Access Block Requested Platforms Conditional Access Break Glass Account Covered By...Conditional Access Break Glass Account Excluded Conditional Access Browser O365 Missing MFA Conditional Access Coverage Gap

Related Entra ID guides

This is an Entra ID and identity check. See the broader guidance and the exact checks Siemserva runs in this area:

Conditional Access analysis Entra ID security best practices Azure AD and Entra ID security All Conditional Access checks

Common questions

What does the Conditional Access Enforces Risk Levels Both Signin And User Risk In Same Policy check verify?

A single CA policy includes both sign-in risk and user risk. Microsoft recommends separating these It is a Medium Severity check in the Conditional Access domain, one of the 650+ checks Siemserva runs across Microsoft 365, Intune, Defender, and Entra ID.

How do I fix a Conditional Access Enforces Risk Levels Both Signin And User Risk In Same Policy finding?

Split into two policies: one for sign-in risk (require MFA) and one for user risk (require password change) Siemserva ranks the finding by Severity and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI, can propose a validated, approve-before-apply configuration fix.

Which compliance frameworks does this check evidence?

Findings from this check map to SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS, HIPAA, including SCuBA policy MS.AAD.1.1v1, MS.AAD.2.1v1, MS.AAD.2.2v1, MS.AAD.2.3v1, MS.AAD.3.1v1, MS.AAD.3.2v1, and MCSB controls IM-6, LT-3. That mapping is what turns a scan finding into audit evidence.

Can I ask my own AI about this check?

Yes. This page includes a free copy-paste AI prompt carrying the check's facts: what it verifies, the risk, the remediation, and the framework mappings. Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot; cite-worthy detail without giving an AI access to your tenant.

All 672 checks with severities and mappings: the Microsoft 365 security checks catalog.