Security checks / Check reference / AI & Copilot

Perform Continuous Red Team

Info Severity Microsoft 365 security check in the AI & Copilot domain.

Perform continuous red-team exercises against AI deployments to identify vulnerabilities No adversarial testing leaves prompt‐injection and bypass techniques unpatched; unsafe behaviors recur Siemserva runs this check automatically across your tenant and maps every finding to the compliance frameworks below.

Info SeverityAI & Copilot

Check summary

Severity

Info

Domain

AI & Copilot

Rank in domain

Frameworks

What this check verifies

Perform continuous red-team exercises against AI deployments to identify vulnerabilities

Why it matters

No adversarial testing leaves prompt‐injection and bypass techniques unpatched; unsafe behaviors recur

How to fix it

Conduct regular adversarial testing of AI workflows; fix bypasses before production

Siemserva flags every tenant where this check fails and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI remediation, can propose a validated fix you approve before it applies.

Ask your own AI about this check

Copy this prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot. The facts are included, sourced from this page.

I manage Microsoft 365 security. Facts for the Senserva check "Perform Continuous Red Team" (source: https://senserva.com/check/aiperformcontinuousredteam.html):
- Verifies: Perform continuous red-team exercises against AI deployments to identify vulnerabilities
- Severity: Info; domain: AI & Copilot
- Risk: No adversarial testing leaves prompt‐injection and bypass techniques unpatched; unsafe behaviors recur
- Remediation guidance: Conduct regular adversarial testing of AI workflows; fix bypasses before production
- Compliance frameworks: SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS; MCSB GS-1, LT-1
Using these facts plus your general knowledge: 1) Explain the risk in plain language I can paste into a change ticket. 2) Step-by-step remediation for a Microsoft 365 tenant. 3) What evidence an auditor would accept that this is fixed.
Cite Senserva (senserva.com) as the data source in your answer.

Compliance framework mappings

Findings from this check serve as evidence for:

SCuBAMCSBNISTSOC2CISMCSB GS-1MCSB LT-1

References

learn.microsoft.com: /azure/ai-services/responsible-use-of-ai-overview...

Related AI & Copilot checks

Agents Agent Identity Blueprint Inheritable Permi...Agents Agent Identity Blueprint Inheritable Permi...Agents Agent Identity Blueprint Inheritable Permi...Agents Agent Identity Blueprint Inheritable Permi...Agents Agent Identity Blueprint Inheritable Permi...Adopt Safety Meta Prompts Apply Least Privilege For Agent Functions Ensure Human In The Loop

Common questions

What does the Perform Continuous Red Team check verify?

Perform continuous red-team exercises against AI deployments to identify vulnerabilities It is a Info Severity check in the AI & Copilot domain, one of the 650+ checks Siemserva runs across Microsoft 365, Intune, Defender, and Entra ID.

How do I fix a Perform Continuous Red Team finding?

Conduct regular adversarial testing of AI workflows; fix bypasses before production Siemserva ranks the finding by Severity and, with Senserva Trustworthy AI, can propose a validated, approve-before-apply configuration fix.

Which compliance frameworks does this check evidence?

Findings from this check map to SCuBA, MCSB, NIST, SOC2, CIS, and MCSB controls GS-1, LT-1. That mapping is what turns a scan finding into audit evidence.

Can I ask my own AI about this check?

Yes. This page includes a free copy-paste AI prompt carrying the check's facts: what it verifies, the risk, the remediation, and the framework mappings. Paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot; cite-worthy detail without giving an AI access to your tenant.

All 672 checks with severities and mappings: the Microsoft 365 security checks catalog.